Find the right product for you and get 10% off.
activity

Two people on your team keep clashing and it's quietly taxing everyone

30 min· Career Discovery

This is for you if two people on your team keep grinding against each other, and the whole team feels it. Meetings go tense, complaints surface in your 1-1s, everyone works around the pairing. You can see the cost, but you can't fix it without taking a side.

Most clashes feel like a values fight, but they are not. They are two people who work differently, each reading the other's way as a flaw in character. The fast one looks reckless; the careful one looks like a foot-dragger.

This is one of the hardest things a new manager faces. Here is one, about half an hour.

Before you bring them together, open both people's results to the same section: Understanding Styles. It names each person's working style, one of four: Accelerator, Analyst, Harmonizer, or Pragmatist.

Near the end of that section is a "Working with [each style]" card. It shows how each one builds trust, decides, and handles conflict. Use both people's own results; it does not run on a guess.

  1. Name the recurring moment. Pick the exact scene where it always goes wrong: the planning meeting, the handoff, the review. Not "they don't get along," but the moment you could replay.
  1. Have each read two things first, on their own. Their own working style, and the "Working with [the other person's style]" card. Each arrives holding a translation of the person across the table.
  1. In the room, each takes a turn. Each says how they work and what they need to do their best. Then each names where the difference bites. You stay the translator, not the judge.
  1. Say the translation out loud. Name one clash as a style difference: "Dan is not stalling; a careful thinker needs the reasoning before the call, not after." When both see the difference, that flash of recognition is the work. Stop there, and pull from the questions below.
  1. Close on one change each. Before they leave, each writes one thing they will do differently next time. One might read: "In Thursday's planning, I ask what he is seeing before I lock the plan." Two lines, written down, are what they leave with.

You own the structure. They own the difference they named.

Coaching questions

This is not a script. Once the two see the clash as a style difference, pull whatever fits the room.

Naming the difference

  • Say back what you just heard the other one needs, in their words, not yours.
  • Where have you been reading how they work as a decision about you?
  • When they do the thing that gets under your skin, what are they probably trying to do well?

Widening it

  • Where else does this same friction show up between you two?
  • Who else on the team works the way they do, and does it grind there too?

Moving toward change

  • What is one thing you could do differently the next time that moment comes?
  • How would each of you know it was starting to work?